Все, кто написал под прошлым постом в комментариях, что на фотографии Константин Хабенский и Сергей Безруков, оказались правы. Поздравляем вас, вы очень наблюдательны🥳
Попытайтесь снова угадать, какие 2 актрисы изображены на фотографии, сгенерированной ИИ.
Все, кто написал под прошлым постом в комментариях, что на фотографии Константин Хабенский и Сергей Безруков, оказались правы. Поздравляем вас, вы очень наблюдательны🥳
Попытайтесь снова угадать, какие 2 актрисы изображены на фотографии, сгенерированной ИИ.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching.
from hk
