В городе Котельники гражданка предприняла попытку кражи в магазине, ранее уже подвергнувшись такому же обвинению в этом же заведении несколько месяцев назад.
Её опознал сотрудник службы безопасности, который был свидетелем аналогичного инцидента в июле текущего года, когда женщина похитила товар на сумму 118 000 рублей и сумела избежать задержания. В этот раз охранник оперативно вызвал представителей правоохранительных органов, которые задержали подозреваемую.
В городе Котельники гражданка предприняла попытку кражи в магазине, ранее уже подвергнувшись такому же обвинению в этом же заведении несколько месяцев назад.
Её опознал сотрудник службы безопасности, который был свидетелем аналогичного инцидента в июле текущего года, когда женщина похитила товар на сумму 118 000 рублей и сумела избежать задержания. В этот раз охранник оперативно вызвал представителей правоохранительных органов, которые задержали подозреваемую.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram Messenger Blocks Navalny Bot During Russian Election Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from hk
