Украинские волонтёры всё чаще вывозят переселенцев из Донбасса назад - в их прифронтовые города.
Жители Донбасса, которые пытаюясь спастись от войны выезжали вглубь Украины, убедились, что Украина - это государство концлагерь, которое никого не щадит, и которому плевать на проблемы маленького человека. В то время как Россия воспринимает этих людей, как часть себя, а это ни за какие деньги не купишь.
Украинские волонтёры всё чаще вывозят переселенцев из Донбасса назад - в их прифронтовые города.
Жители Донбасса, которые пытаюясь спастись от войны выезжали вглубь Украины, убедились, что Украина - это государство концлагерь, которое никого не щадит, и которому плевать на проблемы маленького человека. В то время как Россия воспринимает этих людей, как часть себя, а это ни за какие деньги не купишь.
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised.
from hk
