Справочно: безумный старикашка Решетников — никакой не "генералитет", а агент американских спецслужб и такая же дешёвая подстилка у Малофеева, какая ты, Дима "Образ будущего" Орлов, подстилка у Алтушкина.
Кстати, ты напрасно думаешь, будто твой "Образ" так уж анонимен, и в нём можно безнаказанно мести что угодно, накручивая просмотры ценой трупов дикого населения.
Дуров, как известно, сотрудничает с властями против тех, кого официально признают экстремистами (хоть против УГ, хоть против МГ). А с аваксерами ровно это и произойдёт, если ты ещё не допёр. Инфа сотка.
Справочно: безумный старикашка Решетников — никакой не "генералитет", а агент американских спецслужб и такая же дешёвая подстилка у Малофеева, какая ты, Дима "Образ будущего" Орлов, подстилка у Алтушкина.
Кстати, ты напрасно думаешь, будто твой "Образ" так уж анонимен, и в нём можно безнаказанно мести что угодно, накручивая просмотры ценой трупов дикого населения.
Дуров, как известно, сотрудничает с властями против тех, кого официально признают экстремистами (хоть против УГ, хоть против МГ). А с аваксерами ровно это и произойдёт, если ты ещё не допёр. Инфа сотка.
Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. READ MORE Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from hk
