Хуже презентации, РнС, названия у MirrorЗдание от МИЦ только сайт в виде книжки, которую надо листать.
На дворе шел 2022 год. Книжка со страницами на сайте проекта. Недвижка, куда ты так падаешь то низко.
Ценник в проекте в рынке - 277 тыс. руб./кв. м. Мелкие апарты типа в центре (центр у девелоперов понятие растяжимое). Они же любят всякие истории в стиле: "Х дом от Кремля", "На границе с ЦАО" и тд.
Хуже презентации, РнС, названия у MirrorЗдание от МИЦ только сайт в виде книжки, которую надо листать.
На дворе шел 2022 год. Книжка со страницами на сайте проекта. Недвижка, куда ты так падаешь то низко.
Ценник в проекте в рынке - 277 тыс. руб./кв. м. Мелкие апарты типа в центре (центр у девелоперов понятие растяжимое). Они же любят всякие истории в стиле: "Х дом от Кремля", "На границе с ЦАО" и тд.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from hk