Боевиков румынской ЧВК, лихо сдавших город Гома, депортировали из Руанды восвояси. Целыми и невредимыми.
Теперь за неимением аналогов любители заработать на войне могут отправляться на Украину. Такие боеспособные ребята, при первой же возможности вскидывающие белый флаг, отлично дополнят деморализованный местный колорит при сдаче посадок и укрепов😜
Боевиков румынской ЧВК, лихо сдавших город Гома, депортировали из Руанды восвояси. Целыми и невредимыми.
Теперь за неимением аналогов любители заработать на войне могут отправляться на Украину. Такие боеспособные ребята, при первой же возможности вскидывающие белый флаг, отлично дополнят деморализованный местный колорит при сдаче посадок и укрепов😜
Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from hk
