Ведь сама идея интеграции в НАТО и ЕС была изначально попыткой сбалансировать рассматриваемую Тбилиси как агрессивную политику Москвы за счет вовлечения новых политических игроков в регион. НАТО воспринимался как военный блок, а ЕС – финансовый и образовательный ресурсы. Их трансформация в предметы религиозной направленности произошла уже постфактум на фоне кризиса политического класса, мысли, неспособности этого же класса и местных философов-мыслителей предложить определенные реальные социально-политические, экономические реформы.
The original idea of NATO and EU integration was a strategy to counterbalance Moscow’s perceived aggression by involving new political players in the region. NATO was seen as a military bloc, and the EU as a source of financial and educational resources. Their transformation into ideological symbols occurred later against the backdrop of a political class crisis and the failure of Georgian thinkers and philosophers to propose tangible socio-political and economic reforms.
Ведь сама идея интеграции в НАТО и ЕС была изначально попыткой сбалансировать рассматриваемую Тбилиси как агрессивную политику Москвы за счет вовлечения новых политических игроков в регион. НАТО воспринимался как военный блок, а ЕС – финансовый и образовательный ресурсы. Их трансформация в предметы религиозной направленности произошла уже постфактум на фоне кризиса политического класса, мысли, неспособности этого же класса и местных философов-мыслителей предложить определенные реальные социально-политические, экономические реформы.
The original idea of NATO and EU integration was a strategy to counterbalance Moscow’s perceived aggression by involving new political players in the region. NATO was seen as a military bloc, and the EU as a source of financial and educational resources. Their transformation into ideological symbols occurred later against the backdrop of a political class crisis and the failure of Georgian thinkers and philosophers to propose tangible socio-political and economic reforms.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. I want a secure messaging app, should I use Telegram? And indeed, volatility has been a hallmark of the market environment so far in 2022, with the S&P 500 still down more than 10% for the year-to-date after first sliding into a correction last month. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, has held at a lofty level of more than 30.
from hk
