✍ بهترین راه جلوگیری از شایعه‌پراکنی ایجاد نظام اقامۀ دعوی است زیرا که امکان اقامۀ دعوی برای کشوری آزاد همان قدر سودمند است که افترا زدن زیانبار است. فرق میان آن دو اینجاست که برای افترا زدن اقامۀ شاهد لازم نیست و اصلاً نیازی به اثبات درستی افترا وجود ندارد و از این رو هر کسی می‌تواند به هر کس تهمت بنهد در حالی که برای اقامۀ دعوی نیازمند دلیل و گواه است. دعوی را باید در دادگاه یا در برابر سنا یا در مقابل مردم اقامه کرد ولی جای افترا زدن و شایعه پراکندن میدان‌های عمومی و محافل خصوصی است.
آنجا که نظام اقامۀ دعوی وجود ندارد افترا زدن رواج می‌یابد.
✍ بهترین راه جلوگیری از شایعه‌پراکنی ایجاد نظام اقامۀ دعوی است زیرا که امکان اقامۀ دعوی برای کشوری آزاد همان قدر سودمند است که افترا زدن زیانبار است. فرق میان آن دو اینجاست که برای افترا زدن اقامۀ شاهد لازم نیست و اصلاً نیازی به اثبات درستی افترا وجود ندارد و از این رو هر کسی می‌تواند به هر کس تهمت بنهد در حالی که برای اقامۀ دعوی نیازمند دلیل و گواه است. دعوی را باید در دادگاه یا در برابر سنا یا در مقابل مردم اقامه کرد ولی جای افترا زدن و شایعه پراکندن میدان‌های عمومی و محافل خصوصی است.
آنجا که نظام اقامۀ دعوی وجود ندارد افترا زدن رواج می‌یابد.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from hk
