Подільський районний суд Києва виніс вирок колишньому депутату Верховної Ради Криму за державну зраду, пов’язану з підтримкою окупації півострова у 2014 році. Його засудили до 14 років позбавлення волі.
Він брав активну участь у засіданнях Верховної Ради Автономної Республіки Крим, де 6 березня 2014 року ухвалили рішення про проведення незаконного референдуму, а 11 березня — про проголошення "незалежності" Криму.
Подільський районний суд Києва виніс вирок колишньому депутату Верховної Ради Криму за державну зраду, пов’язану з підтримкою окупації півострова у 2014 році. Його засудили до 14 років позбавлення волі.
Він брав активну участь у засіданнях Верховної Ради Автономної Республіки Крим, де 6 березня 2014 року ухвалили рішення про проведення незаконного референдуму, а 11 березня — про проголошення "незалежності" Криму.
BY Суспільне Крим
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from hk
