В рамках проекта "Народная сеть" Московским отделением передано: - 136 бригаде 🟩 30 сетей 3*6м и 15 ТОПов; - 1853 полку 🟩 40 сетей 2*2,5м; - 26 ТП 🟩 30 сетей 3*6м. Все сети сплетены нашими волонтерами Всероссийского проекта 🟩 Народная сеть 🌟ОПБФ "Немезида"- настоящими героями тыла!
Ребята благодарят всех, кто принимает участие в изготовлении средств маскировки.
🔴 для подачи заявки на получение масксетей для подразделений - пишите в бот @maskseti_bot
Количество подразделений, которым мы сможем помочь, зависит от каждого из нас. Наши не придут, все наши - это мы!
В рамках проекта "Народная сеть" Московским отделением передано: - 136 бригаде 🟩 30 сетей 3*6м и 15 ТОПов; - 1853 полку 🟩 40 сетей 2*2,5м; - 26 ТП 🟩 30 сетей 3*6м. Все сети сплетены нашими волонтерами Всероссийского проекта 🟩 Народная сеть 🌟ОПБФ "Немезида"- настоящими героями тыла!
Ребята благодарят всех, кто принимает участие в изготовлении средств маскировки.
🔴 для подачи заявки на получение масксетей для подразделений - пишите в бот @maskseti_bot
Количество подразделений, которым мы сможем помочь, зависит от каждого из нас. Наши не придут, все наши - это мы!
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from hk
