💫 Вже цієї суботи 💫 🎶KYIV DRUM&BASS CHARITY EVENT!🎶
🔥Для тих, хто любить DNB та готовий допомогти вистояти навалу орди! Приєднуйся до вечора підтримки захисників ЗСП УДА «Дніпровські Штурмгевери». Всі кошти з квитків ми спрямовуємо на допомогу нашим хлопцям.
📍 Київ, клуб Volume та Backstage, вул. Гарматна, 26/2 🗓23.11(субота) 🕔 Початок о 17:00
💫 Вже цієї суботи 💫 🎶KYIV DRUM&BASS CHARITY EVENT!🎶
🔥Для тих, хто любить DNB та готовий допомогти вистояти навалу орди! Приєднуйся до вечора підтримки захисників ЗСП УДА «Дніпровські Штурмгевери». Всі кошти з квитків ми спрямовуємо на допомогу нашим хлопцям.
📍 Київ, клуб Volume та Backstage, вул. Гарматна, 26/2 🗓23.11(субота) 🕔 Початок о 17:00
The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. READ MORE "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from hk
