🔴🔴🔴Ежегодно в Приморье в общем числе заезжает около 100000 мигрантов. 66% из них узбеки. Мы не можем обойтись без этой трудовой силы. Но использоание этой рабочей силы должно быть упорядочено. Об этом заявил губернатор Приморского края Олег Кожемяко в ходе программы "Прямой разговор".
🔴🔴🔴Ежегодно в Приморье в общем числе заезжает около 100000 мигрантов. 66% из них узбеки. Мы не можем обойтись без этой трудовой силы. Но использоание этой рабочей силы должно быть упорядочено. Об этом заявил губернатор Приморского края Олег Кожемяко в ходе программы "Прямой разговор".
BY Вести Приморье
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from hk