Нам пришло видео от ребят-военных, на котором они наглядно показали, что турникет «Светлина» из штатной аптечки Минобороны - это говно, чтоб слов не подбирать. А если подбирать, то это лютое говно. Хуже турникетов мы давно не видели, даже дешёвые китайцы обычно лучше.
Нам пришло видео от ребят-военных, на котором они наглядно показали, что турникет «Светлина» из штатной аптечки Минобороны - это говно, чтоб слов не подбирать. А если подбирать, то это лютое говно. Хуже турникетов мы давно не видели, даже дешёвые китайцы обычно лучше.
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source."
from hk
