As usual, the "Ns Heathenry" channel of the Brazilian pagans demonstrates their tendency to avoid even minimal research before citing a source. To begin with, we have already briefly outlined the reasons why his diaries are unreliable [1]. Moreover, the Swedish historian Mikael Nilsson, author of "Hitler Redux" and "Christianity in Hitler's Ideology", explains the true meaning of this passage. Let's read together:

Something that must be addressed in this context is a statement in Alfred Rosenberg’s diary from June 28, 1934, where it says that Hitler had said the following: “He stressed, laughing, that he for a long time – now more than ever – had been a pagan.”
Does this mean that Hitler had changed his religious belief by this time? Possibly, but it is in fact not likely that we should interpret Rosenberg’s rendering of Hitler’s utterances about being a “pagan” literally.
Hitler was always dismissive and disdainful toward the paganist and occult practices within Himmler’s Ahnenerbe circle.
“Pagan” should therefore in this case likely be interpreted as a sarcastic reference to the many charges from the Christian churches regarding Hitler’s and the Nazis’ paganism.
It was, probably, a sort of an inside joke. We know, from one of Goebbels’ speeches on December 4, 1935, that the accusation coming from the Church that the Nazis were paganists was sarcastically accepted in this way.
Another statement that could be interpreted as proof of Hitler having had pagan beliefs is when he said the following at the end of his speech at President Hindenburg’s funeral at Tannenberg on August 7, 1934: “Dead Field Marshal, go now into Valhalla!”.
But according to Hitler’s private adjutant, Julius Schaub, this was not an expression of Hitler’s religious faith, but instead intended as a spontaneous sarcastic comment to the eulogy that the military chaplain had just held before him.
Victor Klemperer also considered this to be a ridiculing statement that desacralized the funeral and not an utterance of Hitler’s pagan beliefs. [2]

So this passage actually turns out to be another joke made by Hitler to make fun of the pagans.
So we have proven once again that
Ns Heathenry is simply cherry picking sources an order to make Adolf Hitler more in their image but FAILED.

SOURCE:
[1] Rosenberg Diaries exposed
[2] Christianity in Hitler's Ideology by Mikael Nilsson, pp. 155-156

A group of pagans seems to continue to spread this to prove that the NSDAP was pagan, so let's refute this bullshit point by point:

1- The hooked cross is a Christian symbol and is a political representation of what Christianity wants and should want [1]. Moreover, the hooked cross and the cross of Christ did not oppose each other:

The cross of Christ and the Hooked Cross do not need to oppose each other, and must not do so, but rather they can and should stand together. One should not dominate the other, but rather each should maintain its own meaning and significance. The cross of Christ points toward heaven and admonishes us: Remember that you are Christian people, carried by the eternal love of the heavenly father, free through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, sanctified by the power of God’s spirit. The Hooked Cross, however, points to the world as a divine creation and admonishes us: Remember that you are German, born in German territory to parents of German blood, filled with the German spirit and essence, formed according to German nature. Both together, however, the cross of Christ and the swastika, admonish us: Remember that you are German Christian people and should become ever more whole German Christian people, and remain so! [2]

2- In fact, the Bible addresses the issue of race multiple times, stating that racial mixing is forbidden (Genesis 1:24; Deuteronomy 23:2-3; Deuteronomy 7:3; Jude 1:7; Daniel 2:43; Micah 5:7; Joel 1:4; Ezra 9:2; Numbers 25:6-17; Malachi 1:2-3), and emphasizing the importance of race even after Christ (1 Peter 2:9; Romans 9:3). However, some pagans might respond by citing Galatians 3:28. Galatians 3:28 is by far one of the most misquoted and misinterpreted sections of the New Testament in regards to Theology. Superficially, this verse appears to be pushing for racial egalitarianism, and denies the material reality of race and racial hierarchy in the world, but this interpretation is nothing more than a Gnostic heresy. Contrary to the conventional understanding of this verse, the actual dogmatic commentaries on Galatians preach the exact opposite message, being that Race as a material reality will forever remain engrained into the character of an individual regardless if they adhere to Christianity or not:
St. Augustine explains perfectly that this verse does not diminish the carnal racial and genetic conditions of the different races.

Difference of race or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles themselves teach that it is to be respected, and they even proposed living in accord with the racial differences between Jews and Greeks as a wholesome rule. For we observe in the unity of faith that there are no such distinctions. Yet within the orders of this life they persist. [3]

As can be seen here, St Augustine affirms that as Christians we are united by our faith and thus our souls are equal in the eyes of God, however he dispels the notion that racial distinctions do not exist and points out that these distinctions are to be respected and treated as a "wholesome rule". It is clear then, that Paul is not denying the existence of racial distinctions, and as the Church Fathers have pointed out, despite our unity in faith, we are still distinct from each other racially in accordance with the races that God fashioned (Acts 17:26), clearly disproving attempts made to show that this verse illustrates the irrelevance of race.

3- All these quotes come from a single source namely: Hitler's Table Talks. This source is well known to be unreliable and fraudulent but this does not seem to matter to pagans. From Hitler Redux by Mikael Nilsson we read:

The idea that the table talks contain Hitler's words as they were actually spoken to his entourage in the various military HQs during the war must, as a result, be considered to have been conclusively disproven. The table talks are not that kind of sources, since they, contrary to what has been assumed by prior research, were not the product of stenographic notes. Instead, they were re-constructed entirely from memory, and sometimes partly from so- called supporting words. Heim's proof pages show that they were not only edited later on – text was added, taken out, or moved around – and sometimes finished long after the date on them. [...]
This means that they are not Hitler's words and that they cannot, and should not, be quoted as such. [4]

4- Catholic clergy were locked up for subversive activity against the Reichskonkordat and disobeying just laws [which align with Mother Church’s moral teachings]... Not because they were Catholic. This is proven here: [5] [6]. The order to remove the crucifixes was carried out by Martin Bormann against the will of Hitler, who once he became aware of this, he ordered Bormann that this kind of actions had to stop immediately [7].
There is no evidence that the old testament was removed, some of the Deutsche-Christen Protestant theologians debated on removing it, but ultimately decided not to remove the Old Testament from canon this would be summed up in their comprehensive 28 Theses [8].
Hitler was in favor of immediately releasing priests arrested for political reasons if they would stop interfering in politics in the future but would limit themselves to spiritual activities only [9]. Likewise Himmler was also in favor of freeing the priests in one case or another [10].

5- Mikael Nilsson's book Christianity in Hitler's Ideology debunks the myth that Christianity was only used for political reasons:

It was this heritage that Hitler drew upon when he spoke of Jesus as an Aryan warrior who had devoted his life to the struggle against the materialist Jews. It was the Jesus who chased the money-lenders out of the temple grounds that Hitler professed to admire and idolize. Hitler held to his views of Jesus until the very end. He kept insisting that Jesus was not a Jew and kept considering him as a role model for National Socialists everywhere. He did so both in public and, more importantly, in private. Why did he do that if the character of Jesus was not very important for him and his ideological and religious beliefs? There was absolutely no propaganda reason for Hitler to privately state this view at the end of the war if he did not really believe what he said. This is no doubt the strongest evidence that Hitler really did believe what he said about Jesus [11].

So we have proven that this group of pagans is simply cherry-picking sources in ordering to make the NSDAP more in their image, but they FAILED.

SOURCE:
[1] Hitler's speech in Munich on October 25, 1930
[2] Gerhard Hahn, Christuskreuz und Hakenkreuz, Schriftenreihe der “Deutschen Christen” Hannovers, Nr. 1 (1934)
[3] A History of Interpretation of Galatians 3:28 Page 9
[4] Hitler Redux page 384
[5] Are we fighting the Church?
[6] Hitler was my Friend by Heinrich Hoffman Page 167
[7] Hitler was my Friend by Heinrich Hoffman Page 165
[8] Die 28 Thesen der sächsischen Volkskirche zum inneren Aufbau
der Deutschen Evangelischen Kirche notable ones: 11 / 12 / 13
[9] Hitler was my Friend by Heinrich Hoffman Page 167
[10] NS 19/3323
[11] Christianity in Hitler's ideology page 83

For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people. And when I look on my people I see it work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week it has only for its wage wretchedness and misery. When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people is plundered and exploited."

-Adolf Hitler, Munich - Speech of April 12, 1922

Source:
Adolf Hitler, Collection of Speeches
1922 -1945, Page 17-18

Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niemöller was a German theologian and Lutheran pastor. He is best known for his opposition to the Nazi regime during the late 1930s and for his widely quoted 1946 poem:

"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me [Christians] – and there was no one left to speak for me."

He became one of the founders of the Confessing Church, which opposed the Nazification of German Protestant churches. He opposed the Nazis' Aryan Paragraph. For his opposition to the Nazis' state control of the churches, Niemöller was imprisoned in Sachsenhausen and Dachau concentration camps from 1938 to 1945

Wiki

Newspapers of Martin Niemöller opposing paganism from the German government here and here. This (((Christscum))) arrested for opposing NS racialism because of his religion.. then put in a camp right after. GOOD RIDDANCE

@NSHeathenry

WHY DID HITLER HAVE NIEMÖLLER ARRESTED?

The answer is given to us by Heinrich Hoffman's memoirs:

At dinner one evening Hitler told us that he had ordered the arrest of Pastor Niemöller – the same Niemöller who, in 1935, had spoken of ‘the mighty work for the unification of our people, which has begun among us.’ Bormann nodded appreciatively. ‘The monitoring service submitted a report to me, which contained a verbatim transcript of a telephone conversation between Niemöller and some other frater in Christo. Therein Niemöller not only spoke most spitefully about me personally, but also expressed views of a highly treasonable character. I sent for him, and when he started unctiously to pay his respects, I told him quite bluntly that his devotion to me was nothing but sheer hypocrisy. I then handed him the report from the monitoring service, refused to listen to any further explanations, and had him handed over to the Gestapo.’

Some years later, I asked Hitler why Niemöller was still in prison.

‘He’ll stay where he is, until he signs the undertaking,’ declared Hitler categorically.
At the same time, he had given Himmler orders that Niemöller was to be kindly treated in captivity.

SOURCE:
Hitler was my Friend by Heinrich Hoffman, Page 167/168

I will leave the channel to new administrators. Whoever wants to be appointed as such, write to me privately. @Ww2_The_Untold_Truth

A censored 卐 channel is back:

https://www.group-telegram.com/nqatzysupremacy

He said in the last session of the Landtag that his feeling "as a man and a Christian" prevented him from being an anti-Semite. I SAY: MY FEELING AS A CHRISTIAN POINTS ME TO MY LORD AND SAVIOUR AS A FIGHTER. IT POINTS ME TO THE MAN WHO ONCE IN LONELINESS, SURROUNDED ONLY BY A FEW FOLLOWERS, RECOGNIZED THESE JEWS FOR WHAT THEY WERE AND SUMMONED MEN TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THEM AND WHO, GOD'S TRUTH! WAS GREATEST NOT AS SUFFERER BUT AS FIGHTER. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before – the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross.

Adolf Hitler, Munich - Speech of April 12, 1922

Source:
Adolf Hitler, Collection of Speeches
1922 -1945, Page 17