🇷🇺Auf dem Frontabschnitt Kursk konnten die russischen Streitkräfte die ukrainische Armee in den Ortschaften Krasnooktjabrskoje und Wessjoloje-Obuchowka zum Rückzug zwingen.
Das meldet der TG-Kanal "Schopot Fronta". Außerdem haben die Streitkräfte Russlands die Flanke der ukrainischen Gruppe nahe Medweschje attackiert. - новаяроссия.ru
🇷🇺Auf dem Frontabschnitt Kursk konnten die russischen Streitkräfte die ukrainische Armee in den Ortschaften Krasnooktjabrskoje und Wessjoloje-Obuchowka zum Rückzug zwingen.
Das meldet der TG-Kanal "Schopot Fronta". Außerdem haben die Streitkräfte Russlands die Flanke der ukrainischen Gruppe nahe Medweschje attackiert. - новаяроссия.ru
"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from id
