Елочки в The Tate Museum of London 🎄Shirazeh Houshiary, 1993/2016 🎄 Julian Opie, 1996 🎄 Michael Landy, 1997 🎄 Mark Wallinger, 2003 🎄 Sarah Lucas, 2006 🎄 Catherine Yass, 2000 🎄 Cathy De Monchaux, 1994 🎄 Richard Wilson, 1998 🎄 Boyd Webb, 1991
Елочки в The Tate Museum of London 🎄Shirazeh Houshiary, 1993/2016 🎄 Julian Opie, 1996 🎄 Michael Landy, 1997 🎄 Mark Wallinger, 2003 🎄 Sarah Lucas, 2006 🎄 Catherine Yass, 2000 🎄 Cathy De Monchaux, 1994 🎄 Richard Wilson, 1998 🎄 Boyd Webb, 1991
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Friday’s performance was part of a larger shift. For the week, the Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq fell 2%, 2.9%, and 3.5%, respectively. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists."
from id