Приглашаем вас на встречу с Олегом Орловым, сопредседателем Центра защиты прав человека «Мемориал» и известным правозащитником.
В феврале 2024 года он был приговорён к 2,5 годам заключения по обвинению в «дискредитации Вооружённых сил РФ» из-за своей публичной антивоенной позиции. Однако 1 августа 2024 года он был освобождён в результате беспрецедентного обмена заключёнными между путинской Россией и странами Запада.
На встрече мы обсудим текущую ситуацию с правами человека в России, работу правозащитных организаций в современных сложных условиях, а также вызовы, с которыми сталкиваются активисты и правозащитники.
Приглашаем вас на встречу с Олегом Орловым, сопредседателем Центра защиты прав человека «Мемориал» и известным правозащитником.
В феврале 2024 года он был приговорён к 2,5 годам заключения по обвинению в «дискредитации Вооружённых сил РФ» из-за своей публичной антивоенной позиции. Однако 1 августа 2024 года он был освобождён в результате беспрецедентного обмена заключёнными между путинской Россией и странами Запада.
На встрече мы обсудим текущую ситуацию с правами человека в России, работу правозащитных организаций в современных сложных условиях, а также вызовы, с которыми сталкиваются активисты и правозащитники.
"There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from id
