Для понимания сути происходящего просто сравните реакцию на голую жопу Ивлеевой с голой вечеринки и реакцию на попытку ввести в России норму шариата в виде многоженства. Сраных квадроберов обсуждали больше, чем попытку слома светских правил и законодательной базы. Это уже не симптом - это уже диагноз.
Для понимания сути происходящего просто сравните реакцию на голую жопу Ивлеевой с голой вечеринки и реакцию на попытку ввести в России норму шариата в виде многоженства. Сраных квадроберов обсуждали больше, чем попытку слома светских правил и законодательной базы. Это уже не симптом - это уже диагноз.
BY Уставший миграционщик
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from id
