🇺🇸🤡У Камалы Харрис выключился телесуфлер - и она пытается говорить без подсказок
«Запомните цифру 32. Сегодня у нас осталось 32 дня до выборов. Да уж, 32 дня! 32 дня. Нам еще нужно кое-что сделать. Да, 32 дня. И мы знаем, что сделаем это. И это будет очень напряженная гонка до самого конца. Это будет очень, очень напряженная гонка до самого конца. Да. И мы знаем, что впереди у нас тяжелая работа».
🇺🇸🤡У Камалы Харрис выключился телесуфлер - и она пытается говорить без подсказок
«Запомните цифру 32. Сегодня у нас осталось 32 дня до выборов. Да уж, 32 дня! 32 дня. Нам еще нужно кое-что сделать. Да, 32 дня. И мы знаем, что сделаем это. И это будет очень напряженная гонка до самого конца. Это будет очень, очень напряженная гонка до самого конца. Да. И мы знаем, что впереди у нас тяжелая работа».
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching.
from id
