58 батальон спецназа 1 Донецкого армейского корпуса продолжает уничтожение боевой техники врага. Оператору ударного БпЛА удалось порвать защитную сетку танка и сбросить боеприпас прямо в открытый люк башни. В результате у танка загорелся и сдетонировал боекомплект.
Второй танк сетки не имел, и также был уничтожен сбросами в открытые люки.
58 батальон спецназа 1 Донецкого армейского корпуса продолжает уничтожение боевой техники врага. Оператору ударного БпЛА удалось порвать защитную сетку танка и сбросить боеприпас прямо в открытый люк башни. В результате у танка загорелся и сдетонировал боекомплект.
Второй танк сетки не имел, и также был уничтожен сбросами в открытые люки.
As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from id
