Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7327 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Михаил Хазин | Telegram Webview: hazinOpen/1642 -
А вот это уже явная заказуха, причём качеством чуть получше: https://www.group-telegram.com/russic... ************************************** **************************************
Полная версия доступна в закрытом канале по подписке с помощью бота
А вот это уже явная заказуха, причём качеством чуть получше: https://www.group-telegram.com/russic... ************************************** **************************************
Полная версия доступна в закрытом канале по подписке с помощью бота
BY Михаил Хазин
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. 'Wild West' If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from id