Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7927 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ivbg.ru Ленинградская область | Telegram Webview: ivbgru/15817 -
В Ленобласти из 1 785 коек для пациентов с COVID-19 и пневмонией заняты 1 513 🏥
Только за последние сутки в регионе госпитализированы 216 человек, коронавирус был подтвержден у 114. Всего развернуто 1 785 коек для пациентов с COVID-19 и пневмонией, из них заняты 1 513.
По данным на 18 июня, с начала кампании прививку от коронавируса сделали 215 202 жителя Ленобласти. Полностью вакцинацию завершили 174 699 человек. Всего в регион поступило 254 894 комплекта вакцины. Израсходовано 84,6% поступившей в регион вакцины.
В Ленобласти из 1 785 коек для пациентов с COVID-19 и пневмонией заняты 1 513 🏥
Только за последние сутки в регионе госпитализированы 216 человек, коронавирус был подтвержден у 114. Всего развернуто 1 785 коек для пациентов с COVID-19 и пневмонией, из них заняты 1 513.
По данным на 18 июня, с начала кампании прививку от коронавируса сделали 215 202 жителя Ленобласти. Полностью вакцинацию завершили 174 699 человек. Всего в регион поступило 254 894 комплекта вакцины. Израсходовано 84,6% поступившей в регион вакцины.
BY ivbg.ru Ленинградская область
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from id
