Как передает украинский Генштаб, вчера, согласно нашему плану, укрхунта ликвидировала более 1300 наших военных, 55 танков, 120 бронированных машин и т.д... Хороший план у Герасимова, ничего не скажешь. Это ж каким нужно быть гениальным военачальником чтобы подготовить такой превосходный план?
Как передает украинский Генштаб, вчера, согласно нашему плану, укрхунта ликвидировала более 1300 наших военных, 55 танков, 120 бронированных машин и т.д... Хороший план у Герасимова, ничего не скажешь. Это ж каким нужно быть гениальным военачальником чтобы подготовить такой превосходный план?
BY Критик новостной ленты
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from id
