Шушум не любит ездить в тесных переносках. Ему больше нравится с удовольствием развалится на коврике в ногах. Там как раз ещё дует со всех сторон 🥳 Решила дать ему фисташку, пусть узнает, чем его хотят желающие покормить. Он конечно галантный мужчина, вежливо взял и за бутылку выкинул 🤓
Шушум не любит ездить в тесных переносках. Ему больше нравится с удовольствием развалится на коврике в ногах. Там как раз ещё дует со всех сторон 🥳 Решила дать ему фисташку, пусть узнает, чем его хотят желающие покормить. Он конечно галантный мужчина, вежливо взял и за бутылку выкинул 🤓
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from id
