Мария, вы хороший дипломат, вестимо. Умеете целые телеги текста гнать, но никакого ответа на вопрос нет. А ведь вопрос весьма интересен. И вы, как работник МИДа, как мы полагаем, вполне себе должны отвечать на подобное, а не разливать воду, сбегая от ответа. Впрочем, чего ещё ожидать от Министерства Озабоченности.
Мария, вы хороший дипломат, вестимо. Умеете целые телеги текста гнать, но никакого ответа на вопрос нет. А ведь вопрос весьма интересен. И вы, как работник МИДа, как мы полагаем, вполне себе должны отвечать на подобное, а не разливать воду, сбегая от ответа. Впрочем, чего ещё ожидать от Министерства Озабоченности.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from id
