Помню, когда читал в первый раз, эта, по сути дела, небольшая повесть произвела на меня ошеломительное впечатление. Навсегда запомнилось многое, Платонов великий мастер, но особенно - слова одного из героев: "Пошли на смерть! Лучше неё теперь нет жизни!" Такое не придумаешь.
Помню, когда читал в первый раз, эта, по сути дела, небольшая повесть произвела на меня ошеломительное впечатление. Навсегда запомнилось многое, Платонов великий мастер, но особенно - слова одного из героев: "Пошли на смерть! Лучше неё теперь нет жизни!" Такое не придумаешь.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
from id
