Открыт 10й, юбилейный сбор в благотворительный фонд "Славянский Корпус", все пожертвования пойдут на нужды русским воинам разведотряда 106 "Светлояр".🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Все переводы, как обычно, будут отскринены, и выложены в комментариях первого поста данного сбора, который будет в "закрепе" до конца самого сбора.
Сумма сбора 100к+
Помочь русскому воинству: 2202 2006 6838 9115 СБЕР Ольга Т. (номер карты копируется нажатием) Комментарий: "106"
Открыт 10й, юбилейный сбор в благотворительный фонд "Славянский Корпус", все пожертвования пойдут на нужды русским воинам разведотряда 106 "Светлояр".🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Все переводы, как обычно, будут отскринены, и выложены в комментариях первого поста данного сбора, который будет в "закрепе" до конца самого сбора.
Сумма сбора 100к+
Помочь русскому воинству: 2202 2006 6838 9115 СБЕР Ольга Т. (номер карты копируется нажатием) Комментарий: "106"
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from id
