✏️وقتی محسن از ساختمان هلال‌احمر بیرون آمد، از خوشحالی در پوست خود نمی‌گنجید.
بعد از مدت‌ها انتظار، به او خبر داده بودند که آخر هفته نوبتش شده و به منطقه اعزام می‌شود. از خوشحالی نفهمید چطور تا مسجد محله‌شان رانندگی کرد. چند مسافر را هم سوار کرد و...
✏️وقتی محسن از ساختمان هلال‌احمر بیرون آمد، از خوشحالی در پوست خود نمی‌گنجید.
بعد از مدت‌ها انتظار، به او خبر داده بودند که آخر هفته نوبتش شده و به منطقه اعزام می‌شود. از خوشحالی نفهمید چطور تا مسجد محله‌شان رانندگی کرد. چند مسافر را هم سوار کرد و...
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from id
