Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
UrFU_Religiovedcheskaya_expertiza_posobie_1.pdf
2.3 MB
Религиоведческая экспертиза: учебное пособие / Е.В. Иванова, Е.В. Лейканд, Д.В. Павин, О.В. Кузнецова, О.М. Фархитдинова, З.Е. Чернышкова; под общ. ред. Е. В. Лейканд; Министерство науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации, Уральский федеральный университет. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2024. 168 с.

В учебном пособии указываются нормативно-правовые основы государственной религиоведческой экспертизы и судебной религиоведческой экспертизы, представлена методика религиоведческого анализа, приведены критерии выявления религиозной принадлежности объектов экспертизы, раскрыты особенности экспертного исследования религиозного объединения и культовой деятельности, проанализированы религиоведческие аспекты экспертиз по делам об экстремизме и оскорблении религиозных чувств.



group-telegram.com/socofreligion/1298
Create:
Last Update:

Религиоведческая экспертиза: учебное пособие / Е.В. Иванова, Е.В. Лейканд, Д.В. Павин, О.В. Кузнецова, О.М. Фархитдинова, З.Е. Чернышкова; под общ. ред. Е. В. Лейканд; Министерство науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации, Уральский федеральный университет. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2024. 168 с.

В учебном пособии указываются нормативно-правовые основы государственной религиоведческой экспертизы и судебной религиоведческой экспертизы, представлена методика религиоведческого анализа, приведены критерии выявления религиозной принадлежности объектов экспертизы, раскрыты особенности экспертного исследования религиозного объединения и культовой деятельности, проанализированы религиоведческие аспекты экспертиз по делам об экстремизме и оскорблении религиозных чувств.

BY Studia Societatis


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/socofreligion/1298

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from id


Telegram Studia Societatis
FROM American