Знаем мы этих порицателей. Устроили судилище на публику. Еще бы моральный кодекс строителя коммунизма вспомнили. А сами наверняка в перерыве просили у Гудкова телефончик стриптизерши. Один из депутатов (фамилию называть не будем) даже поинтересовался, есть ли у нее еще подруги и какой прайс на допуслуги. Ну там приваты, боди-массажи и прочие телесные радости.
Знаем мы этих порицателей. Устроили судилище на публику. Еще бы моральный кодекс строителя коммунизма вспомнили. А сами наверняка в перерыве просили у Гудкова телефончик стриптизерши. Один из депутатов (фамилию называть не будем) даже поинтересовался, есть ли у нее еще подруги и какой прайс на допуслуги. Ну там приваты, боди-массажи и прочие телесные радости.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed.
from id
