Сегодня в 19.00 Мск пройдет первый публичный разбор полезных для понимания окружающей реальности текстов и книг. Давно планировали деятельность по разбору сделать публичной, но немного подтормаживал наш "Салон профессиональных читателей". Сейчас, надеюсь, разгонимся.
Тема #1: разбор книги "Доктрина шока" Наоми Кляйн
Профессиональный читатель: Ольга Талалайченко (Новосибирск)
Книга жалоб и предложений в комментариях к этому посту
Сегодня в 19.00 Мск пройдет первый публичный разбор полезных для понимания окружающей реальности текстов и книг. Давно планировали деятельность по разбору сделать публичной, но немного подтормаживал наш "Салон профессиональных читателей". Сейчас, надеюсь, разгонимся.
Тема #1: разбор книги "Доктрина шока" Наоми Кляйн
Профессиональный читатель: Ольга Талалайченко (Новосибирск)
Книга жалоб и предложений в комментариях к этому посту
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels.
from id
