Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8174 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Харэ | Telegram Webview: tghare/373 -
Кто сдвинул земную ось? Ч.2. Всадники апокалипсиса
Ч.1. См. здесь. Продолжение гипотезы о развитии нашей Солнечной системы. Великолепная графика и простое описание сложнейших процессов. Убойная доказуха - на последней минуте. Желаю приятного просмотра!
Кто сдвинул земную ось? Ч.2. Всадники апокалипсиса
Ч.1. См. здесь. Продолжение гипотезы о развитии нашей Солнечной системы. Великолепная графика и простое описание сложнейших процессов. Убойная доказуха - на последней минуте. Желаю приятного просмотра!
Видео с ютуб-канала Эпоха недоверия.
BY Харэ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from id
