To my great sorrow, Sverigedemokraterna (SD – Sweden Democrats) have a hard time implementing positive change in the parliament.
They have to contend with anti-Swedish agents of the regime (Liberalerna – the “Liberals”, for example) that they are supposedly in a coalition with. Add to this their actual opponents (Social Democrats, primarily).
Many obstacles for sure.
However, being the second largest party in Sweden, they definitely have the capacity to impose positive change – were it not for a lack of will.
There are, of course, some in SD with courage and will galore. But we need more of them in the party.
Thus, I repeat my previous recommendation – we need to get more driven individuals (with a good moral compass – i.e. those who put Sweden and the Swedes first) into political parties (SD in particular).
The good individuals in SD need reinforcements.
Even during this “Conservative” government, citizenships have been handed out en masse to non-Europeans (sure votes for the Social Democrats in the upcoming election).
So their passivity in this regard (i.e. not closing the borders and not revoking citizenships) has, I am afraid, lost them the coming election.
We still have time, but not so much time that we can afford be lazy.
To my great sorrow, Sverigedemokraterna (SD – Sweden Democrats) have a hard time implementing positive change in the parliament.
They have to contend with anti-Swedish agents of the regime (Liberalerna – the “Liberals”, for example) that they are supposedly in a coalition with. Add to this their actual opponents (Social Democrats, primarily).
Many obstacles for sure.
However, being the second largest party in Sweden, they definitely have the capacity to impose positive change – were it not for a lack of will.
There are, of course, some in SD with courage and will galore. But we need more of them in the party.
Thus, I repeat my previous recommendation – we need to get more driven individuals (with a good moral compass – i.e. those who put Sweden and the Swedes first) into political parties (SD in particular).
The good individuals in SD need reinforcements.
Even during this “Conservative” government, citizenships have been handed out en masse to non-Europeans (sure votes for the Social Democrats in the upcoming election).
So their passivity in this regard (i.e. not closing the borders and not revoking citizenships) has, I am afraid, lost them the coming election.
We still have time, but not so much time that we can afford be lazy.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 230 points, or 0.7%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively. All three indexes began the day with gains before selling off.
from id
