Любопытно, что еще в 1932—1934 гг. Эрнст Юнгер с холодным пафосом писал, что свобода и комфорт — это буржуазные ценности, и что все великое постигается через жертвы, боль и тотальную мобилизацию. Однако после проигранной войны писатель страдает через закрытые границы, недоступную французскую визу и невозможность поплавать в Средиземном море да половить бабочек и жуков на Лазурном берегу.
Любопытно, что еще в 1932—1934 гг. Эрнст Юнгер с холодным пафосом писал, что свобода и комфорт — это буржуазные ценности, и что все великое постигается через жертвы, боль и тотальную мобилизацию. Однако после проигранной войны писатель страдает через закрытые границы, недоступную французскую визу и невозможность поплавать в Средиземном море да половить бабочек и жуков на Лазурном берегу.
BY Философ Вышинский
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from id
