В предзимнем парке усадьбы Воронино, виды на сизые ростовские дали с колокольни. Обожаю все это, и эту прозрачность и отражения в прудах и старинные липы и могучие лиственницы, до снега не сбрасывающие свой желтый наряд, и свежую отаву на полях и лужайках и тишину и далекий лай собак. Космос русской усадьбы.
В предзимнем парке усадьбы Воронино, виды на сизые ростовские дали с колокольни. Обожаю все это, и эту прозрачность и отражения в прудах и старинные липы и могучие лиственницы, до снега не сбрасывающие свой желтый наряд, и свежую отаву на полях и лужайках и тишину и далекий лай собак. Космос русской усадьбы.
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from in
