Дугин в первые дни после Нового года ставит вопрос ребром: или смерть элиты или смерть Родины. Переживаю за него. Замахнулся на святое. Он наверно забыл, что Владимир Владимирович своих не бросает.
Дугин в первые дни после Нового года ставит вопрос ребром: или смерть элиты или смерть Родины. Переживаю за него. Замахнулся на святое. Он наверно забыл, что Владимир Владимирович своих не бросает.
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from in
