Предварительные результаты выборов Президента Российской Федерации в 47 регионе на 5 утра 18 марта от главы Избирательной комиссии. Ленинградской области Михаила Лебединского.
Обработаны почти 94% протоколов. Явка - 80,53%. За Владимира Путина проголосовали 915 056 человек, это 86,15%. За Николая Харитонова - 50661 человек, это 4,77%. За Владислава Даванкова - 43455 человек, это 4.09%. За Леонида Слуцкого 32205 человек, это 3,03%.
Избиратели Ленинградской области повторили рекордный результат явки, который был показан при голосованиии по поправкам в Конституцию Российской Федерации.
Предварительные результаты выборов Президента Российской Федерации в 47 регионе на 5 утра 18 марта от главы Избирательной комиссии. Ленинградской области Михаила Лебединского.
Обработаны почти 94% протоколов. Явка - 80,53%. За Владимира Путина проголосовали 915 056 человек, это 86,15%. За Николая Харитонова - 50661 человек, это 4,77%. За Владислава Даванкова - 43455 человек, это 4.09%. За Леонида Слуцкого 32205 человек, это 3,03%.
Избиратели Ленинградской области повторили рекордный результат явки, который был показан при голосованиии по поправкам в Конституцию Российской Федерации.
BY Тайны Ленинградского двора ZVO
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from in
