На кадрах видно, что улицы деревни больше похожи на небольшую реку со своим течением. Местные жители рассказывают: воду пригнало волной из Казахстана. Уже побит рекорд 2017 года.
Тем временем, паводок добрался и до Муромцевского района. Подтоплено несколько деревень. Власти не исключают, что может потребоваться эвакуация жителей. Видео от подписчика. Прислать нам кадры можно в @Predlozhka99_Bot
На кадрах видно, что улицы деревни больше похожи на небольшую реку со своим течением. Местные жители рассказывают: воду пригнало волной из Казахстана. Уже побит рекорд 2017 года.
Тем временем, паводок добрался и до Муромцевского района. Подтоплено несколько деревень. Власти не исключают, что может потребоваться эвакуация жителей. Видео от подписчика. Прислать нам кадры можно в @Predlozhka99_Bot
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from in
