«Регион имеет право принять решение о дополнительных мерах поддержки ветеранов, не попавших под действие Указа Президента РФ, и мы этим правом воспользовались. Выявили 8 уважаемых ветеранов, в том числе две вдовы борцов с бандеровцами. Помощь будет оказана, мы изыскали средства, и уже в мае они будут выделены»
«Регион имеет право принять решение о дополнительных мерах поддержки ветеранов, не попавших под действие Указа Президента РФ, и мы этим правом воспользовались. Выявили 8 уважаемых ветеранов, в том числе две вдовы борцов с бандеровцами. Помощь будет оказана, мы изыскали средства, и уже в мае они будут выделены»
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from in
