В прямом эфире весь мир наблюдал высшую степень персонализации политики. Выше просто и быть не может.
Ну и вот где же, где все хваленые институты, нормы и процедуры? Нет ничего, всё исчезло. Только личности, характеры, психология. И конечно же, инерция.
И нет, вовсе не ИИ, на мой взгляд. Чёткое психологическое портретирование и старая - добрая ловушка "эскалации упрямства", как уже писал.
В прямом эфире весь мир наблюдал высшую степень персонализации политики. Выше просто и быть не может.
Ну и вот где же, где все хваленые институты, нормы и процедуры? Нет ничего, всё исчезло. Только личности, характеры, психология. И конечно же, инерция.
И нет, вовсе не ИИ, на мой взгляд. Чёткое психологическое портретирование и старая - добрая ловушка "эскалации упрямства", как уже писал.
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices.
from in
