Если вкратце - перестаньте врать. Преимущества в дронах и технике перед ВСУ в Курской области у нас нет. Есть в силе воле, решимости и эффективности.
Враг стянул серьезные силы, атакует постоянно, тащит в регион подкрепления. Идут тяжелые позиционные бои. Если это ломает чью-то картину мира, рисованную восторженными соплями по сахарной бумаге - это его проблема.
Если вкратце - перестаньте врать. Преимущества в дронах и технике перед ВСУ в Курской области у нас нет. Есть в силе воле, решимости и эффективности.
Враг стянул серьезные силы, атакует постоянно, тащит в регион подкрепления. Идут тяжелые позиционные бои. Если это ломает чью-то картину мира, рисованную восторженными соплями по сахарной бумаге - это его проблема.
Доброе утро ☕️
BY ZERGULIO🇷🇺
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from in
