Сергей, живу в приграничной Белгородской области, Старый Оскол. Сегодня наблюдал такую картину: проезжала фура на украинских номерах через блок-пост Горшечное - Cтарый Оскол в направлении Старого Оскола. И ее даже не остановили документы проверить, не говоря о том, что он может перевозить в прицепе. Имхо, неправильно это.
Сергей, живу в приграничной Белгородской области, Старый Оскол. Сегодня наблюдал такую картину: проезжала фура на украинских номерах через блок-пост Горшечное - Cтарый Оскол в направлении Старого Оскола. И ее даже не остановили документы проверить, не говоря о том, что он может перевозить в прицепе. Имхо, неправильно это.
BY ZERGULIO🇷🇺
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from in
