На видео Оксана Сенеджук, 58 годиков, главный специалист «Научно-исследовательского института градостроительства, архитектуры, изысканий и среды» в Севастополе.
Оксана яростный борец с режимом, поэтому передавала СБУ сведения о кораблях ЧФ РФ. И за свои старания на днях получила 15 лет колонии общего режима по ст. 275 УК РФ (государственная измена).
Русский Севастополь будет процветать и развиваться. А гражданка Сенеджук будет сидеть. Выйдет в 73 года.
На видео Оксана Сенеджук, 58 годиков, главный специалист «Научно-исследовательского института градостроительства, архитектуры, изысканий и среды» в Севастополе.
Оксана яростный борец с режимом, поэтому передавала СБУ сведения о кораблях ЧФ РФ. И за свои старания на днях получила 15 лет колонии общего режима по ст. 275 УК РФ (государственная измена).
Русский Севастополь будет процветать и развиваться. А гражданка Сенеджук будет сидеть. Выйдет в 73 года.
What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from in
