🇺🇸🇨🇳 Руководитель отдела искусственного интеллекта и криптографии Дэвид Сакс заявил, что китайская фирма DeepSeek, по всей видимости, использовала метод «дистилляции» — технологию, при которой нейронная сеть «буквально извлекает знания» из «другой более мощной модели».
По его словам, есть доказательства того, что DeepSeek перенял знания из моделей OpenAI, из-за чего теперь от разработчиков требуют искать способы защиты от подобного копирования в будущем👀
🇺🇸🇨🇳 Руководитель отдела искусственного интеллекта и криптографии Дэвид Сакс заявил, что китайская фирма DeepSeek, по всей видимости, использовала метод «дистилляции» — технологию, при которой нейронная сеть «буквально извлекает знания» из «другой более мощной модели».
По его словам, есть доказательства того, что DeepSeek перенял знания из моделей OpenAI, из-за чего теперь от разработчиков требуют искать способы защиты от подобного копирования в будущем👀
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from in
