🇺🇦⚰️Колоссальные потери ВСУ уже невозможно замалчивать. На всех кладбищах Украины появляются целые «кварталы» новых могил ВСУшников🪖 Неугомонный Zеленский тащит на дно Украину вместе с её жителями. Сильнее всего достается военнослужащим ВСУ, которых ТЦК пачками забирают с улиц и заставляют идти умирать за "демократию" и "европейские ценности" 📱|U_G_M|
🇺🇦⚰️Колоссальные потери ВСУ уже невозможно замалчивать. На всех кладбищах Украины появляются целые «кварталы» новых могил ВСУшников🪖 Неугомонный Zеленский тащит на дно Украину вместе с её жителями. Сильнее всего достается военнослужащим ВСУ, которых ТЦК пачками забирают с улиц и заставляют идти умирать за "демократию" и "европейские ценности" 📱|U_G_M|
Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from in
