حقیقت برای این شخص با توجه به محیط اجتماعی‌ش ، این هست که بیان میکنه.
وقتی نتایج آزمایشات علمی رو با هر نظریه ای میشه منطبق کرد ، از کجا معلوم نظر این کودک درست تر از نظر عام نباشه و امام اول رقیه و امام هشتم کربلا نباشه؟!
حقیقت برای این شخص با توجه به محیط اجتماعی‌ش ، این هست که بیان میکنه.
وقتی نتایج آزمایشات علمی رو با هر نظریه ای میشه منطبق کرد ، از کجا معلوم نظر این کودک درست تر از نظر عام نباشه و امام اول رقیه و امام هشتم کربلا نباشه؟!
But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted.
from in
