Вот такой рейтинг через бота нас обзывают проходить еженедельно. Здесь отвечать реакцией, а в управление мы отправлять должны Скрины с чат-бота 🤢🤦🏻♀️🤬🤬🤬
Повторюсь. Интересуют начальство не дети и не условия работы сотрудников. А рейтинг "госпабликов".
Вот такой рейтинг через бота нас обзывают проходить еженедельно. Здесь отвечать реакцией, а в управление мы отправлять должны Скрины с чат-бота 🤢🤦🏻♀️🤬🤬🤬
Повторюсь. Интересуют начальство не дети и не условия работы сотрудников. А рейтинг "госпабликов".
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from in
