Алёшкинские птички и белочки питаются лучше, чем манул Тимофей из Московского зоопарка!😊 "Зажировка" к зиме очень радуют! 🥰 Все бодры, веселы и приглашают вас в Алёшкинский лес в первый день зимы — 1 декабря — с угощениями! 😋 Всем, кто принял участие в пополнении запасов для кормушек, большое спасибо! 🙏 Все угощения будут поданы в клювы и лапки вовремя. 🐦🐿❄️
Алёшкинские птички и белочки питаются лучше, чем манул Тимофей из Московского зоопарка!😊 "Зажировка" к зиме очень радуют! 🥰 Все бодры, веселы и приглашают вас в Алёшкинский лес в первый день зимы — 1 декабря — с угощениями! 😋 Всем, кто принял участие в пополнении запасов для кормушек, большое спасибо! 🙏 Все угощения будут поданы в клювы и лапки вовремя. 🐦🐿❄️
"Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from in