🪖 Фонд «Защитники Отечества» в Запорожской области помогает детям участников СВО
У регионального отделения 102подопечных, для которых разрабатывают специальные программы и проекты, направленные на реабилитацию и поддержку. Этим летом для ребят организовали поездки в лагеря и на «Университетские смены» в Крым и Ярославскую область⤴️⤴️⤴️ Куда обращаться? 📍 Мелитополь, пл. Победы, д. 1 📞 +7 (990) 249-69-37 #отдых
🪖 Фонд «Защитники Отечества» в Запорожской области помогает детям участников СВО
У регионального отделения 102подопечных, для которых разрабатывают специальные программы и проекты, направленные на реабилитацию и поддержку. Этим летом для ребят организовали поездки в лагеря и на «Университетские смены» в Крым и Ярославскую область⤴️⤴️⤴️ Куда обращаться? 📍 Мелитополь, пл. Победы, д. 1 📞 +7 (990) 249-69-37 #отдых
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from in
