Опять... Не успеешь восстановиться после одной пачки конкурсов (на которые я так ничего и не успел подать), как подъезжают новые, благослови Вселенная их организаторов:
1. ИРИ запустил очередной конкурс сериалов. Принимают до 31 января. Если вы не знали, чем заняться на Новый год, то теперь знаете 💻
Опять... Не успеешь восстановиться после одной пачки конкурсов (на которые я так ничего и не успел подать), как подъезжают новые, благослови Вселенная их организаторов:
1. ИРИ запустил очередной конкурс сериалов. Принимают до 31 января. Если вы не знали, чем заняться на Новый год, то теперь знаете 💻
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. I want a secure messaging app, should I use Telegram? Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from in
